2019 - On March 14, 2019, the Tokyo District Court found Karpelès guilty of falsifying data to inflate Mt. Gox’s holdings by $33.5 million, for which he was sentenced to 30 months in prison, suspended for four years, meaning he will serve no time unless he commits additional offenses over the next four years.
2019 - In November 2019, Private Internet Access was acquired by Kape Technologies.
In 2017 Knapp sold CyberGhost to an Israeli company called Crossrider for €9.2 million. Crossrider changed its name to “Kape Technologies” in 2018 – for reasons that we’ll explain below. Now here’s where things get interesting. When you research the company Crossrider (now Kape) you learn it is a company known for infecting devices with malware. When you research the company Crossrider, you find numerous articles about Crossrider malware and adware, such as this article from Malwarebytes:
Crossrider offers a highly configurable method for its clients to monetize their software. The common method to infect end-users is software bundlers. The installers usually resort to browser hijacking. Targeted browsers are Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome, and sometimes Opera. Crossrider not only targets Windows machines but Macs as well.
PUP.Optional.Crossrider installs are typically triggered by bundlers that offer software you might be interested in and combine them with adware or other monetizing methods. According to Malwarebytes and many other reputable online security websites, Crossrider was hiding malware in software bundlers, which would then infect the user’s computer with “adware or other monetizing methods”.
Trust takes years to build, second to break and Forever to repair.
Consensus 2018 Report (Continuous Updates Through May 17th)
Happy Wednesday! We are live! Consensus Short Statistics
8,500+ attendees representing 100 countries and 2000 companies.
50% of attendees came from outside the U.S.
5 stages, with more rooms for tech demos and conference tables.
State of Blockchain Don Tapscott -"We are entering a new era of trust" -Generally remarked on the benefits of blockchain. Identified the 7 types of crypto assets (Currencies, Collectibles, Stablecoins, Natural Asset Tokens [Representing minerals, water], Utility Tokens, and Security Tokens.) FedEx As I remarked in my comment earlier, FedEx is incredibly bullish on blockchain technology generally, but specifically in it's applications for cross-border shipping and asset-tracking. As I learned, the definition of what constitutes a "coffee cup" differs from place to place. Using blockchain, Smith says, FedEx can protect against unforeseen obstacles at customs. "Information about the package is as important as the package itself," he claims, further adding that the risk of experimenting with cryptocurrency is "de minimis" when compared to its alternative. During the session, FedEx unveiled "Trons", bluetooth-enabled sensors integrated with blockchain first announced in 2016. Jim Bullard, St. Louis Fed Fantastic, informational lecture regarding the history of currency and how civilizations have reacted to various implementations. Generally, Bullard notes, humans want a uniform currency. He compared cryptos with state/provincial bank notes, citing the problems faced with exchange, regulation, and value verification. We haven't yet realized this problem with cryptocurrencies since the market cap is relatively small. Insightful statistics about and charts comparing GDP to the inflation/exchange rates of the DollaYen. Surprisingly, the volatility charts look worse than Bitcoin. Catch all of these when the videos are released later this week. Summarizing, Bullard claimed that there will be a plurality of coins sharing the ecosystem, each providing a specific use. The Federal Reserve will likely mint a fiat/cryptocurrency that represents a stable stock of U.S. dollars sometime in the mid term future. Jed McCaleb I spoke with Jed of the Stellar Foundation. This is a Bitcoin subreddit, so I'll skip this part. You can find the full transcript of his thoughts here. Charlie Lee and David Schwarz Both spoke on a panel about interoperability between Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ripple, etc. Developers better understand that most cryptocurrencies can interface as long as they use the same "hooks". Schwartz compared this ideal system akin to TCP-IP; a minimal framework making as few technological demands as necessary. An ecosystem with multiple coins utilizing different security protocols and consensus mechanisms is "good for Bitcoin". In a theoretical world where power becomes abundant, what happens to PoW? We want the ability to migrate to a new protocol without upending the entire financial system. In a world where security is compromised, redundancy is critical. Lee sees UI as the next significant hurdle. Not for speculators, but for mom-and-pop investors without much tech savvy. TxTenna -Hardware to expand and facilitate mesh networks. -Even if you own Bitcoin, transfer can be censored/inhibited through the network communicating the transaction to the blockchain. -Using mesh networks, we bypass many of these constraints dealing directly with sovereign ISP's. -This is fantastic for Bitcoin users in 3rd world countries/those with oppressive regimes. I will leave this to your imagination. RSK
-Smart contract platform on top of the Bitcoin protocol. -Ecosystem challenges (Tx costs, security, scalability) -Tx cost is $0.035 - +10% hashing power -Up to 100 tps. -Next -Payment channels (Lumino) -Predicability (Fiat-based fees) -Decentralization (BTC and RSK full-node rewards) -Interoperability (inter-blockchain integration)
I'm sorry if you find this post lacking/off topic. Attempted to refine down to only what might be relevant to a Bitcoin trader. Even if Bitcoin isn't specifically mentioned, many of these innovations/philosophies will apply to the crypto space generally and, thus, to Bitcoin. It's already the end of Day 2 and I'm finishing the write-up for D1. I'll compile D2 and D3 for brevity's sake. Most of this news is now relatively (a day) old. Thanks for your attention and help supporting the crypto revolution. P.S. "Where is my Consensus boost!? I thought BTC should be $10k by now!" Historically, the Consensus Boost happens several weeks after the event, likely as news disseminates. OH FUCK I FORGOT Joseph Lubin bets BlockChain Capital's Jimmy Song, "any amount of Bitcoin" that blockchain will have widespread enterprise adoption within 5 years Day 2 Will try an update. Sitting through, eToro will be opening business in the United States, launching a wallet shortly after. Users can view successful traders' profiles and subscribe to their trades, copying them second-by-second. Circle announces a USD stablecoin and crypto wallet. HTC announces a crypto phone. Deloitte releases preview of cryptocurrency report, shows majority of companies pursuing blockchain. -"But this is just blockchain". Yes, and a rising tide lifts all ships. The Magical Crypto Friends Live From Consensus. Warning, shitty audio. -Founders of several currencies (Litecoin, Monero) discuss Buffett, Bitcoin, and other BS. 56 minute duration. For the hardcore. Day 3 Alright! Ledger -Announcing a consortium for investors/institutions who manage multiple accounts. Today, Ledger Nano S is really only useful to the individual owner. -Called, "Komino"? (Japanese Script). -Isn't this compromising the dream of Satoshi? Speaker thinks no. The dream is that everyone can use Bitcoin as they see fit. Large companies can have positions in Bitcoin without changing the life of crypto maximalists who can still use cryptocurrencies. -Bankers have the right to "Go full Moon and lambos". Polymath -The next big wave in crypto are Security Tokens. -Real estate, equity in companies. -Amongst crypto VC founders, Security Tokens will comprise 50-90% of the crypto market in the coming years. Currently, the share is approximately 1%. -You can create a security token right now. Log on here and try the demo. -First blockchain telegram to reach 50,000 users. -Integrating with tZero. All new securities should have liquidity out of the box. -ST-20. A security token standard designed to ameliorate many of the issues with fragmented ICO's. -Launching a ST Venture Fund, "Polymath Capital". -New CoinMarketCap competitor. "Tokens.com". Perhaps they'll finally force some innovation on the CMC side. -Polymath 2.0 TestNet now live. BlockStack -Internet 3.0 is here. Mesh networks, decentralized data, crypto assets. We are not storing data with companies anymore, we are personally responsible. One day, we will have a universal ID that removes the need for a rolodex of passwords, usernames, and security questions. -BlockStack members advise on Silicon Valley. Fun fact. -Infrastructure and speculative investment grew from less than $100B in January, to $100B in May, and, finally, over $600B by November. -Sounds like a dApp talk. They're making iTunes for dApps. I'll come back when he says, "Bitcoin". Jack Dorsey and Elizabeth Stark -Jack first heard of Bitcoin in St. Louis via a group of Cypherpunks. -Appreciated the complexity of code, but didn't realize the potential just yet. -Met some engineers who wanted to build a Bitcoin solution for Square. Buyers/sellers could accept Bitcoin without knowing they were using Bitcoin. -Community "felt like Usenet" as it developed between 2014 and 2017. "Felt electric". -Claimed Square's strengths are speed and simplicity. Credit cards are complex and often emotional. Talking about the Cash app, the goal is to revisit the coffee purchase of old and make it feasible using Bitcoin. -"We have evidence to show people are using this as their primary spending account, their primary bank account, and, in some cases, their only bank account." -"We have people that have been blocked from entering the financial industry." Even merchants had problems accepting payments. "Reaching the underserved, reaching the unbanked", he says, feels good. -On Square adopting Bitcoin. "It was certainly contentious within our company." "I guess we always take the mindset that we can't wait for things to happen to us...If we want responsible uses...then we have to make that happen, we have to do the work to educate regulators, educate the SEC, show that we can provide more access to more people...give people a chance to participate in the economy...still a lot of disagreements and fights, but that's where the magic happens. We really push through, and this tested us. There was certainly a spotlight on us because of that fact, but there are a lot of unknowns. We ran towards them." -On the future, the potential of Bitcoin. "The internet deserves a native currency. It will have a native currency. I don't know if it will be Bitcoin or not, but I hope it will be. I appreciate the technology so much; the principles behind it. Using the guide that the Internet will have a global currency...it's going to happen. As a company, as individuals, we need to learn how to make that happen. The biggest thing I worry about as a company is there is so much openness within the community, I hope nothing corporate will come in and threaten it." Protecting the open-source nature of the work. "This is a discussion I have a lot with Mike and the team. No one company or corporation should own this. This is the main question of everyone I meet in the community. We have a completely open mindset to ensure this remains a completely open platform. Let's not wait for it to happen. Let's do our part to encourage it to be used in healthy ways and ensure that everyone has access to it. If we ever go astray call us out. We can't do any of this without the technology being strong and available to everyone." -"Obviously we are a centralized organization that benefits from decentralization. It's a theme of conversation within our organization and we're looking to decentralize our workforce. Cash is an interesting application in our company." Going to Australia next week to check in with the local team there. They are agnostic on what locale partners decide to nest in. -Large corporate HQ's like Twitter and Square, "are a thing of the past". People will be able to work from wherever they please. -"Nobody is going to a bank for a $6,000 loan. They're going to friends and family." They can all be served with this technology. -Hesitates to make articulated 5-10 year predictions, prefers patience and iterating as each year develops. "We want to go back to the original idea of being able to purchase a coffee with it. That's why we're working with you. Whatever it takes to get there, we're going to try and make it happen." Encouraging more access to the financial space is the primary objective of the Square organization. -"Over the past two years since we've really pushed our way into this, I've felt that electricity" -Elizabeth Stark feels like she's living through the mid-90's again, "In a positive way". -Stark is an optimist. "Really seeing the value behind the means of transacting without a middle party." It wasn't until Satoshi's whitepaper did we have the means to build a solution to this problem. -"Our goal with Lightning is to enable an application layer like the Internet". -Stark -On potential, compelling apps built on Bitcoin. "As I said, there's just so much to trust, to identity, to decentralizing almost everything we use today in a centralized way. We get the power of the crowd, the ability to see so many amazing perspectives and opinions to make our answers much better. I don't think about that as much as I think about what we need to focus on." -On what they need to focus on. "There's a desire for more. There's definitely an incentive to hold the technology and encourage a mindset of saving rather than spending. But making it easier to spend, easier to transact, easier to do the everyday is what we need to focus on. We aren't necessarily going to be the company that comes up with the right frameworks or technologies, but I'm confident we'll be part of facilitating the process." -The ultimate relationship with a regulator is that of education, Dorsey claims. -On becomng a global company. "If we were ever able to use it as a payment mechanism today, we could release it all over the world opposed to the 5 markets we're in today. With each market, we have to find a banking partner, work through the regulatory." Only way to accept credit cards in Japan involved a 15-minute interview with an official. There is a large amount of legacy legislation that hampers adoption. -On the next steps of democratizing finance. "Hardest part is continuing this conversation...certainly the regulatory bodies around the world, the banks..." Slowly but surely, Square is converting Goldman Sach's-types, showing them the reasons behind the movement. Having, "healthy discussions at the board level." -On advice getting started in the industry. "Follow the conversation on Twitter, first and foremost. (laughter) And not just follow." When he first followed the industry, he felt like he had nothing to contribute. Join the conversation, express a point of view. "So many people fear expressing an opinion...instead of treating it like a conversation". "While you follow these conversations--jump in. People are going to think you're weird, they'll disagree with you, but you'll sharpen your opinions...find where they resonate." Pursue success from there. BCash I visited the BCash table and asked the representative to respond to claims that the company was causing label confusion amongst BTC and BCH. She locked up, asked if I was press, and, "was not at liberty to discuss the topic". Scam. Scam. Scam. Did I say scam? That's it for Bitcoin! Thanks for playing Consensus 2018! I have tons of photos to upload, which I'll share in the Daily General Discussion as they come online.
Doge Token : AKA the post Sporklin did not want to make.
At times Twitter is not the platform that allows the proper conveyance of engagement, 280 characters is generally not enough; especially for myself. Given the topic here I ask that you allow me the grace of a proper platform in order to do this in a manner that leaves little question to intention. I want to preface this given rarely do I have to do these in public. Myself, the Dogecoin Core Developers believe that the space is wonderful, diverse, creative, and engaging across the several thousands of assets that exist. It is neither my intention nor our intention to prohibit, attack, dissuade or otherwise disincline something from existing in the space. However every now and again projects do pop up that seem to want their "upstart" in the space to begin with attacking Dogecoin. As a community driven asset with deeply communal ties to the entire space there are moments where even we pause and ask for clarity. This can help to gauge intentions, cause and more than once has led to showing someone as a "bad actor" in the space. We have spent over half a decade working with the Doge/Dogecoin branding, there are many assets with the name which we believe only helps to engage further people into cryptocurrency. So Doge Token. Technology DogeCoin is technologically behind
However, it’s core technology has not been upgraded much, and it has not been updated in well over a year latest releases from 2015.
Github can be hard to manage, and understand. What I fail to fathom is how you missed that we have had 7 releases since 2015. Dogecoin Releases. Further for the coming 1.14 release there was active and ongoing communal interaction and input along the way as Dogecoin is a social consensus asset not just network/chain consensus based. Path to 1.14 Which for noting puts our public start into 1.14 barely a year beyond the 1.10 DogeParty release. (Which happened in 2016, where you state nothing has been done since 2015.) Further as is shown there in the above posting 1.16-dev shows work. 1.17-dev Shows work as of 11 days ago even as we are waiting on final push for 1.14. This all counters your claim that there has been no releases, that nothing has been upgraded much. If you would care to explain why your white paper states otherwise I would be willing to listen, especially given as it is rather public what we are doing, when we are doing it, and further more who is doing what. We are community based, and there are comments on both @dogecoin along with @dogecoin_devs both have been active in keeping communities updated. I sourced most of the postings for the large post from reddit, and that is only half of the updates. We have also spent time among the telegram communities, slack, discord, Steam communities, IRC communities across a span of multiple languages no less interacting, updating, and engaging with users. Rolling back into the initial statement, "Dogecoin is technologically behind". I am curious where you see this, personally. This was gone into recently, by someone else who screamed the same things. Reality of Dogecoin Perhaps you missed this as well? Doge Token lives on the Stellar blockchain
Stellar is the one of the fastest growing and largest blockchain platforms out there.
Stellar nodes/validators 43 have uptime in the past 24 hours. Dogecoin Nodes This private node saw 420 other ones in 24 hours. (There are other versions listed there, they are forked coins that did not change the basis so appear on our node relay maps.) Nevermind what our public nodes see daily. Do not take this as a hit to Stellar, it has been around since July 2014. It is old in the space which is amazing it has lasted given how many projects die. However stating that it is one of the fastest growing and largest blockchains, is a bit of a stretch. It is a rather creative stretch in reality. I understand they function differently than Dogecoin in their handling, still "largest blockchain platforms out there"; just to note. ETH 6439 July 2015 BCH 786 BTCU 698 August 2017 / January 2016 BSV 485 November 2018 I got fairly far down the list on CMC and to continue seemed overly harsh as the trend continued.
Constant updates and support further improve the Stellar blockchain platform.
Factual they also do micro releases (small tweak releases) and they do master branch implementation and developmental work. A bit different than many things in the space.
Shibe loves Stellar.
It is a bit mutual. Dogecoin is such an interesting blockchain and serious project, that peek the advisors we have ties, old ones. Even as Stellar grew over the years more than a few of their services did drops to Dogecoin just due to the history between the assets. OneCred rip now This was one of the early services for Stellar. PoW vs Green Tech DogeCoin: Much Hash, Such Work
Even though DogeCoin has many orders of magnitude fewer transactions and smaller transactional value, it now exceeds over 20TH/s in terms of hashrate.
You are not wrong, in fact the other day we were one of the tops for hashrate in the entire space. It has been a long while since we were near 20TH/s though hashrate 9/22/2017 was the last time we were under 20TH/s. Just as a note, more transactions does not mean more energy spent as the energy spent is per block which contains multiple transactions.
The amount of electricity wasted to power stagnant technology negatively impacts the environment
You seem to have missed that Dogecoin is AuxPoW, this means that Dogecoin mining is a byproduct of Litecoin mining. Which is why our hashrates are generally close. This also takes the energy "waste" down to running a node, which most networks in the space have. Deciding it is wasteful simply for your narrative in Dogecoin's case; seems short sighted and a bit targeted.
and reduces mining rewards.
Given there is a very low energy cost via AuxPoW, there is not a reduction in mining rewards. Further given Dogecoin entered the "legacy" mining period we are beyond halvening, we are forever to the 10k block rewards which facilitate ongoing transactional functionality. Transaction fees, along with block rewards go to the miners; there is no reduction to the mining rewards for the miners.
Despite all this waste
Given the network is rather efficient, I do not understand the implication of waste.
DogeCoin is still theoretically much less secure than Stellar.
Based around what theoretical reference? Dogecoin is five and a half years old, in actual reality of functional existence ..Dogecoin has not had an attack that in any manner made the blockchain less secure. Further more blockchain audits, independent security reviews, network health reviews tend to be part of the listing process for the higher level compliant functioning exchanges. To date we have yet to fail one, shutter or even has a questionable passing. You state Dogecoin is insecure in theory.. Did you miss that Dogecoin follows Bitcoin's upstream? The codebase is public, if you wish to state we are insecure I will ask you for the proof of your claims, it is a rather grave implication to make without cause. I assume you have found something everyone else has missed, care to share? Doge Token: Such Green, Much token Transparency and Safety DogeCoin: Much scam, Such Sad
Remember the days of tipbots. Yes? Well we’re sure things didn’t end very well for the most avid tippers.
Pardon? I ask this honestly as we have had multiple tipbots ongoing for multiple platforms; with no issues in assorted communities that have had no issues. Surely you are aware that the tipbots, are external, third party offerings; they are unattached and uninvolved in the actual Dogecoin project. I state this because you seem to be of the mind that because something happened externally, on third party offerings, by third party developers; that it somehow reflects on Dogecoin itself.
Applications built on DogeCoin are often closed source and non-contract enforced.
We only mourn for the nice shibes who were victimized by these viles scammers.
Broad statements are made here in relation to all the tipbots. The one that did have issues, you seem to have missed was not actually tied to the project. Further more it was not just a tipbot that was impacted but an entire company. DogeTipBot. Doge Token: Such Clear, Much Trust
Doge Token cannot be attacked with 51% attack and this makes us invulnerable.
You are correct, it does not take a 51% attack to take Doge Token down. It takes sadly removing two nodes from the Stellar network down to take everything, in the fullest down. Due to their more centralized nature of issuance, and operation the base network under Doge Token is publicly known to have several issues. Recently Stellar had a review by an external third party. Stellar security which goes on to detail several known issues in relation to the base functionality methods of Stellar. Understanding that on the base, anyone can claim anything noting that David himself came out to reply seems important. Further adding to this is just what KAIST is along with why it is important to note that it was not just random people making these claims. Stellar exploit allowed 2.2bn Lumens to be created 2017. This was an onchain direct exploit. Ongoing issues with Stellar, one which related to SDEX where Doge Token exists bug reporting. Stellar Dex had an issue disclosed, which rather went interestingly. Now the very important distinction here, what I have listed above are on chain issues, they are flaws exploits, problems related to the base code of functionality of Stellar itself; not third party issues. They are also public knowledge to be issues do please do not assume I am taking a swing at their project. In the interest of disclosure there have been third party troubles relating to Stellar as well. There was the BlackWallet hack Jan 2018 hack that resulted in 400kUSD stolen.
This makes Doge Token more trust-worthy than DogeCoin.
I will note that your entire white paper is based around false claims, baseless speculation, very easily disproved comments about the Dogecoin project, and further more implied relations which are not the actual basis of anything. We have tried in vain repeatedly to contact your project, and you have resisted. I understand the space is huge, in fact we find it wonderful that it is so diverse. What we pause at, and what will always pause at are projects that make baseless claims, attacks, spread misinformation and bluntly put, lie. Whatever your intentions are this is not the best way to step into the space, especially given we have already had to answer for your projects comments, and we are also very curious why you took a logo without credit to the artist. In terms of trust? Dogecoin has been here for over half a decade, our engagements are public, our codebase is public, our communications. Our communities are user driven, our third party platforms are also user driven. Where do you find fault in the trust-worthiness given who we are is rather public, we engage in the space openly as people, we are honest, direct and very proactive in relation to the entire userbase. Sadly, the same cannot be said for you. With this it is our hope that you do correct your statements, that you do make things clearer, further more crediting the artist of your logo would also be kindly. Your methods are deceptive, your entire whitepaper is made up of libelous commentary. I do hope we can find a middle ground that does not take this much further given your stance thus far as been to mislead users by making grossly incorrect comments to further your own personal gains.
Stellar Hi there! I'd like to welcome both new and seasoned users to Stellar! The community has grown exponentially over the past 6 months and with this growth has come a great collection of fresh ideas to the ecosystem. It's important to remember to protect this community's philosophy of Open-Source Citizenship by respecting the rules (see sidebar and scroll to the bottom of this post) and respecting each other. This community's rules & guidelines are in place to foster collaboration, quality conversation, and user safety. Don't forget to check out our community page for community events, forums, and upcoming program information. Subscribe to the monthly newsletter to stay up-to-date on Stellar. You can also see development updates on our GitHub repositories and chat live with members of the ecosystem on Keybase! Thanks for being a part of the /Stellar community!
What Is Stellar?
Stellar is an open-source, distributed payments infrastructure. It is a leapfrog technology that connects people, payment systems, and banks with a focus on the developing world. It lets you facilitate multi-currency and asset transactions quickly, reliably, and for a fraction of a penny by using a crypto-asset called Lumens (XLM) as a bridge.
If you are interested in volunteering for the /Stellar volunteer mod team, please contact _kolten
You are expected to treat everyone with a certain level of respect and refrain from inappropriate behavior. Examples of inappropriate behavior include:
Threats of violence or attempts to organize attacks
Slurs of any kind
Posting people’s private information and keys
Neurotic and negative behavior
Protect yourself against scams and media impersonators!! Stellar Development Foundation will NEVER ask your Secret Key unless in the official website. Stellar Development Foundation will NEVER contact you in media platforms to offer a giveaway, always report those messages so they can be removed to protect our community. The official links are:
Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) does not endorse any third party organizations that are named in this and/or any other communication(s). Please conduct due diligence and interact with these organizations at your discretion.
No mean to Fudle, but things that worry me as a Ripple 'Hodler' (a mixture of facts and feelings)
Some point from the Dark Side Of The Hodl. Intentions = discussing and learning. • If you are not being an a) inside trader, b) a genius neural network algo day trader or c) a whale manipulator then you probably are a (clueless) hodler like me. • When XRP price went up in December I remember Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse spoke about seeing a trend of Bitcoin and XRP price de-coupling. Looking at recent correlation charts (https://bitinfocharts.com/correlation.html and https://www.sifrdata.com/category/correlations/) there unfortunately still is no real de-coupling. I have faith in Ripple’s vision and technology, but I wonder what level of financial trading knowledge there is inside the company (knowledge of financial markets and financial derivates and manipulation tactics). • Speaking of financial weapons of mass destruction, why do financial derivates even exist? I know how investor Warren Buffet (the third wealthiest person on earth) feels about them. I also know derivates are invented and built by people with rocket science level IQ. These instruments recently infiltrated the cryptocurrency market (futures, ETF, options, swaps etc.). I guess that means “bye” to the original bitcoin philosophy of giving people more control over their own finances and keeping out those who were responsible for the last big financial crisis (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-29/barclays-agrees-to-pay-2-billion-to-settle-u-s-rmbs-suit). But of course, nobly trying to reduce the impact of financial scandals and crisis on the economy and our everyday life is something only Don Quixote would endeavor. Still, we should be grateful to people trying to do the right thing. • Recently Ripple chief cryptographer David Schwartz admitted (on Twitter) he couldn’t explain the recent rise and fall of XRP price (and other cryptocurrencies). For me that adds to uncertainty. • The fact that a large concentration of XRP holdings is in a few hands makes me a little uncomfortable. I am not talking about the escrow part here, which is fine by me. But, I could imagine that ‘the powers that be’ almost got a heart attack when they found out that some relatively small crypto company went from doing financially all right to financially catching up with the wealthiest people on earth. In just a few weeks: https://www.investopedia.com/news/ripple-execs-get-superrich-xrp-success-new-billionaires/ • A large XRP holding in de hand of Ripple rival (and Ripple co-founder) Jed McCaleb from Stellar doesn’t give me peace of mind either. Still, after reading some specifics about Jed McCaleb and Ripple (http://observer.com/2015/02/the-race-to-replace-bitcoin/), I rather support Ripple than Stellar. • Ripple Labs Inc. versus. R3 court case of course also has discomfort potential: https://www.xrpchat.com/topic/18838-ripple-labs-v-r3-update-w-court-documents/ • If these points don’t make you uncomfortable, good for you. But how about others average investors? Or more importantly, how about institutional investors and other big players? • Lastly, (not specific to Ripple or crypto), can somebody explain why anybody should be able to ‘naked short sell’ whatever, with leverage up to 100 times? Or how about 1000 times? Most of the time I just hear the usual hedging, risk management and liquidity nonsense as excuse arguments. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked_short_selling Perhaps price levels only moving in one direction (mostly upwards because of seeing potential in a company or coin but also because of FOMO), is not making enough money for some people. So, let’s make price moving in two directions (instead of one) to double profit potential. Moving in waves around different price levels seems like a money-making cycle that can go on forever. Furthermore, it is just saver to let the price fluctuate at price levels where some people won’t feel threatened too much for losing power status quo. https://ambcrypto.com/price-manipulation-of-bitcoin-btc-okex-announces-rollback-of-futures-contract-data/ TL:DR version: finance sucks, still hodling on…….
Jed McCaleb created eDonkey, one of the largest file-sharing networks of its time, as well as Mt. Gox, the first bitcoin exchange. In 2011, Jed founded Ripple. Recognizing that the world’s financial infrastructure is broken. Jed McCaleb (* 1975) ist Mitbegründer und STO (Development Foundation) von Stellar. Vor der Gründung von Stellar gründete McCaleb die Firma Ripple und arbeitete hier bis 2013. Frühes Leben und Karriere . Jed McCaleb wurde 1975 in Little Rock, Arkansas, geboren. Er besuchte die University of California, wurde jedoch abgebrochen. Also beschloss er, nach New York zu ziehen. Im Jahr 2000 schuf ... Jed McCaleb is an American programmer. He was the creator of Mt. Gox, the trading card website that briefly became the world's largest bitcoin exchange until it ceased operations in 2014. He is also one of the original founders of Ripple, though he left the company in 2013.He co-founded Stellar in 2014.. Background. McCaleb was born in Little Rock, Arkansas in 1975. Maybe you know about Jed McCaleb very well, but do you know how old and tall is he and what is his net worth in 2020? If you do not know, we have prepared this article about details of Jed McCaleb’s short biography-wiki, career, professional life, personal life, today’s net worth, age, height, weight, and more facts. Jed McCaleb is an American programmer and entrepreneur. He is a co-founder and the CTO of Stellar. Prior to co-founding Stellar, McCaleb founded and served as the CTO of the company Ripple until 2013. McCaleb is also known for creating the Mt. Gox, and the peer-to-peer eDonkey and Overnet networks a
The Jed McCaleb Story: Founding Stellar, Ripple & the Journey from eDonkey to MtGox
Trading Bitcoin - Money Printing Still Making ALL ASSETS RISE Tone Vays 1,032 watching Live now CFCon USA 2018 / Jed McCaleb & Adam Ludwin / Issuing assets on blockchain - Duration: 16:55. Jed McCaleb, founder of Mt Gox, Ripple, and Stellar, joins Charlie Shrem on today’s episode of Untold Stories. Charlie and Jed discuss what has motivated Jed to found pivotal projects in crypto ... acompanha matéria em www.startupi.com.br Many moons ago, when the Bad Crypto Podcast was still a toddler, one of our very first guests was Jed McCaleb from Stellar. He showered citizens of Bad Cryptopia with free Stellar Lumens. CNBC Fast money with Ripple and Stellar Co Founder Jed McCaleb - Binance moving to Malta ? Cryptocurrency and the underlying blockchain technology need a decentralized network in order to be ...